ADOC - associazione dei consumatori

 Parlano di noi

Televisione Radio Stampa Internet



web tracker
Information about the access to justice in Italy
2008-04-29
Access to the justice is a new european project of ADOC with ADOCAE and other 7 european organizations
Presentation of the project

Consumption has become in developed societies a massive and widespread phenomenon. Each day millions of people are envoled in processes of hiring goods and services; which very often leads to conflicts of many kinds, both in terms of freedom of choice, product quality, guarantees and security the same as in issues affecting their economic interests, including prices, etc..

Against this background, the protection and defence of consumers and users is an essential need both for reasons of justice as for a healthy and proper functioning of the economic system, wich has consumption one of its pillars. Therefore, justice for consumers, and especially for European consumers, is a prerequisite to enable the single market. There is a single market in motion that affects all Europeans and all consumers but, however, there isn't an effective model of justice to solve problems of consumption, which motivate the citizens' confidence in this great European internal market. While this continues, we can't talk about a market where consumers can trust.

It is true that justice belongs to the scope of issues on which the European Union has less been ale to progress, as the sovereignty and the legal identity of each member state. However, the objetive of a only economically union is unfeasible without a frame built on some common rights that protect citizens and consumers in Europe compared with the problems it brings precisely that market. Indeed, there are often problems that have a special scope qualitatively and quantitatively, particularly in financial services. They are the "collective cases", which can reach thousands, tens of thousands and even millions of citizens. To give some examples, in Spain in recent years there have been cases such as bankruptcies of entities such as securities dealers GESCARTERA AVA, Banks as Eurobank or "financial tramps" as INVESTAHORRO and other cases such as the Academies of English and others entities with payments based on consumer credit, or the case of mass economic fraud to the small shareholders of Terra . Creating a more open market without borders can extend this problem to consumers from several European states, as is already happening with fraud in investment in tangible assets of enterprises as AFINSA affecting consumers in Spain and Portugal.

The dimension of the problem can be seen in all its crudeness if we see that even in these cases so extraordinary collective are appropriate means. These class actions have forced consumers concerned and their associations for the defence to get involved in expensive and complex civil and criminal prosecutions often with an uncertain result because of questions for çwhich these procedures are not intended or inexperienced. The recent European and national legislation on collective

These are the rules in Italy:
Conciliation procedure: it’s an out-of-court way to solve a dispute thanks to an impartial  third party who facilitates communication and negotiation and promotes voluntary decision making by the parties to the dispute. It’s aim is to solve cases in a faster way (compared to the judicial times!), perhaps 30- 40 days by the proposal, and to give parties mutual satisfaction (in the 90% of cases there is a positive result).Parties can select this procedure by an application form on line in companies website or in the website of associations who attends to that procedure. At the conciliation meeting parties can take their lawyer or, in the case of peer conciliation, by an agent of consumer’ s associations.  If  they don’ t manage a settlement they can obviously choose an arbitration or a judicial resolution .It’ s a not expensive procedure because costs are settled at the beginning, and depends only by conciliator’ s fee and secretariat charges.
 
Conciliator: is a human being who must be impartial, independent, professional to lead to an agreement pleased to both parties. It could be a conciliator anyone who is prepared to this profession or has an apposite qualification to do .He don’ t take his fee by parties directly, but only thanks to  agency’ s mediation.
Any conciliator can give his collaboration only to 3 agency at most, and any agency must have 7 conciliator at least.
 
Conciliation in front of a “Giudice di pace” (Peace maker Judge): Italian Civil Procedure Code at 322 article says that it’ s possible to try a resolution of a dispute in front of a “peacemaker judge”, a figure of honorary judge in front of whom can be prosecute settlements of any value and tissue, and in case of a success results it has an  executive value.
 
Conciliation in front of  Business Agencies: thanks  to 580/93 Italian law it is given to Business Agencies the possibility to make an arbitral commission to have a conciliation between companies or companies and consumers. The commission, behind party claim, propose this procedure to the other party and, if accepted, go on searching an effective resolution.
 
Conciliation in Telecommunications: Italian 249/97 law has give the possibility to the Authority for the communications Guaranty, to create a specific procedure to solve dispute about phone (fix or mobile) in a conciliatory way. Later, AGCOM, with 182/02/CONS decision, declared binding this kind of procedure before the in-court resolution, and the 278/04/CSP extended the obligatory effect to pay-tv cases. This function is up to the CO.RE.COM or to Business Agencies, is totally free and the report is immediately enforceable.
 
Conciliation across boundary :this kind of  procedure is made in the European Union to help consumers who have made a purchase on- line or abroad and consists in the presence of advising and information offices.
 
Peer conciliation: to solve disputes with their consumers some important companies settled a kind of out-of-court proceeding which involves consumer’s association and company’ s agents thanks to a specific bargain achieved firstly between associations and company. Differently by the other kind of conciliation there isn’t a third party, thus solution is find in a more friendly way and , because of the fact that there are less judicial proceedings, so less costs, company can improve customer care service.
 
Banking ombudsman (ABI ):   is a collegial organ who solves disputes between banking and broker/consumers. It’ s creation depends by an agreement between consumer’s associations and ABI , which has given to consumers the possibility to solve in a neutral and out-of-court way their cases with banks, till a value (in terms of damage) of 5165€.It’ s a free proceedings which can be used only by consumers “private” before of the in-court solution ; it’ s decision is binding for the ABI (while consumer, if is not satisfied, can choose the in-court proceeding).
 
Online dispute resolution (ODR ): it’ s the online conciliation, so cheaper and faster, and it’ s particularly adapt to disputes relates to technologies, even if can be used about any case. A special kind of ODR concerns the “automatic trading” and consists in the fact that parties switches proposal and counteroffer each other by e-mail to manage an agreement, without a third part, till when the difference between the proposals is into determinate values.
 
Alternative dispute resolution (ADR):this phrase is used to collect the several kind of out-of-court ways provided parties for settling disputes by means other than litigation. So is a less costly and more expedited procedure in which parties voluntary goes to a neutral third party to help each other to solve their dispute equally (so with a mutual satisfactory solution).
 
Judicial conciliation: it’ s a trial  kind of resolution, by 183 article of the Italian civil trial code, which can lead  to close the process because of the cessation of the conflict issue.
 
Arbitrate: is a procedure which take place out-of-court, especially used  for the civil or commercial cases, with the submission to an unbiased third person designated by parties to solve their case thank’ s to a “lodo”, that is binding and could be an executive title, if the formalism is respected.
 
Job conciliation:  about labour dispute it is necessary, before of the in-court settlement, to try the conciliation procedure, with the support of corporate contracts or local agencies (article 410 of Italian civil procedure code) .


http://www.adicae.net/justice/spain/principal.asp

Rating: 4.6/5 (5 votes cast)





« Torna indietro

Copyright © ADOC 2000-2007 Associazione per la Difesa e l'Orientamento dei Consumatori
Presidenza: Via Tor Fiorenza 35, 00199 Roma Tel 06.45420928 06.86398975 Fax 06.86329611
Sede Legale: Via Lucullo, 6 - 00187 Roma · Privacy Policy -